Editorial Policy
Focus and Scape
Jurnal Kesehatan Publik Nusantara (JKPN) is published by the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM) of Universitas Aufa Royhan in Padangsidimpuan City. JKPN is dedicated to publishing research findings, theoretical studies, literature reviews, and phenomena in the field of health.
Section Policy
Peer Review
All submitted manuscripts are screened by the editorial staff. The review process employs a single-blind review system. Manuscripts deemed by the editor not to meet the journal's criteria are rejected immediately without undergoing external review. Manuscripts considered to be of potential interest to readers are sent to reviewers. Subsequently, the editor makes a decision based on the reviewers' recommendations, with the possible outcomes being: rejected, requires major revision, requires minor revision, or accepted.
Publication Frequency
Jurnal Kesehatan Publik Nusantara (JKPN) is published twice a year, namely every July and August.
Open Access Policy
It provides immediate open access to its content, in line with the principle that free access to research supports the wider dissemination of knowledge worldwide. All published articles are available via immediate open access, consistent with the concept that providing free access to research fosters a broader global exchange of information.
This journal is an open-access publication that allows readers to access, download, print, browse, or link to the full text of articles at no cost.
All content published by *Jurnal Kesehatan Publik Nusantara* (JKPN) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Archiving Policy
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) and CLOCKSS (Controlled Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) System to ensure a secure and permanent archive for the journal.
Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics of the Indonesian Health Scientific Journal The Nusantara Public Health Journal (JKPN) is a publication of scientific works from the results of research, education and scientific development in the health sector. Publication Ethics of the Indonesian Scientific Health Journal is a statement of the code of ethics for all parties involved in the publication process of this scientific journal, namely the manager, editor, bestari partners, and authors/writers. This statement of the code of ethics for scientific publications is based on the Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications, which in essence, the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications essentially upholds three ethical values in publications, namely Neutrality, namely free from conflict of interest in managing publications; Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those entitled to be authors/writers; And Honesty, namely free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.
Journal Manager
- Determine the name of the journal, scientific scope, periodicity, and accreditation if necessary.
- Determine the membership of the editorial board.
- Defines the relationship between publishers, editors, publishers and other parties in a contract.
- Respect matters of a confidential nature, both for contributing researchers, authors/writers, editors and bestari partners.
- Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
- Review journal policies and convey them to the author/writers, editorial board, bestari partners, and readers.
- Create code of conduct guidelines for editors and review partners.
- Publish journals regularly.
- Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publication.
- Building cooperation and marketing networks.
- Prepare permits and other legal aspects.
Team Editor
- Meeting the needs of readers and authors/writers.
- Striving to continuously improve the quality of publications.
- Implement processes to ensure the quality of published written work.
- Prioritizing freedom of opinion objectively.
- Maintaining the integrity of the author's academic track record.
- Convey corrections, clarifications, withdrawals and apologies if necessary.
- Responsible for the style and format of the written work, while the content and all statements in the written work are the responsibility of the author/writer.
- Actively solicit the opinions of authors, readers, bestari partners, and editorial board members to improve the quality of publications.
- Encourage an assessment of the journal if there are findings.
- Support initiatives to reduce research and publication errors by asking authors to attach an Ethics Clearance form that has been approved by the Research Ethics Commission.
- Support initiatives to educate researchers about publication ethics.
- Examining the effect of publication policies on the attitudes of authors/writers and bestari partners and improving them to increase responsibility and minimize errors.
- Having an open mind to new opinions or other people's views that may conflict with personal opinions.
- Do not defend your own opinion, that of the author or a third party which could result in a non-objective decision.
- Encourage authors/authors to improve their written work until it is suitable for z
Author/Writer
- Ensure that those included in the list of authors/authors meet the criteria as authors/writers.
- Collectively responsible for the work and content of the article including methods, analysis, calculations and details.
- State the origin of resources (including funding), either directly or indirectly.
- Explain the limitations in the research
- Respond to comments made by Bestari partners in a professional and timely manner.
- Inform the editor if you will withdraw your written work.
- Make a statement that the written work submitted for publication is original, has never been published anywhere in any language, and is not in the process of being submitted to another publisher.
Screening For Plagiarisme
University students,fellows are members of the academic field such a lecture and author, must avoid the plagiarism in making a research plan and thesis. Otherwise, you may be disqualified from the selection.
You must document all of your source material. If you take any text from somebody else, you must make it clear the text is being quoted and where the text comes from. You must also cite any sources from which you obtain numbers, ideas, or other material. Use of ChatGPT or other AI composition software is not permitted.
Such cases are deemed as plagiarism:
1. Copying from books or articles written by another author without full acknowledgement.
2. Copying from an internet source without attribution text or information.
3. Copying and pasting a Wikipedia article into the body of an assignment.
4. Quoting a source without including a citation.
Plagiarism is checked for using the application, Turnitin.
Indexing
Index & Abstract :
- ISSN
- Sinta 5 (Science And Technology Index)
- Garuda
- Google Scholar
- Arjuna
- OneSearch
